Looking up the ticker with the regulator···
0s · usually 20–30 seconds for a cold read
Looking up the ticker with the regulator···
0s · usually 20–30 seconds for a cold read
Accenture plc
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice.
Lower valuation, weak fundamentals
Get notified when we ship meaningful updates. No spam, no daily noise.
3 of 5 met · composite in line with peers
Business quality, valuation against the sector, and position in the 52-week range — whether they line up or not.
Mixed signals
1 signal unavailable
Profitability
3/4
Debt & liquidity
1/3
Efficiency
0/2
Cheaper than most of its peers, ACN carries a P/E of 14.9× — -64% below the sector median of 42.0× — yet the fundamentals that typically justify a premium are absent here. Operating margin runs at 14.7%, -50% below the sector median of 29.2%, and EPS growth year over year of 6.2% trails the sector median of 31.1% by -80%. FCF grew 46.1% year over year, outpacing the sector median of 28.2% by +63%, and Debt/EBITDA of 0.5× sits -49% below the sector median of 0.9× — two genuine bright spots. The F-Score of 4/9 reflects the mixed picture: the efficiency sub-score is weak, and the beat rate over eight quarters is thin; consensus and the realized three-year EPS CAGR are aligned, which at least removes the optimism gap, but both point to modest growth rather than a recovery in the making.
| Ticker | Name | F-Score | ROE | Revenue YoY | Op. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | Apple | 8/9 | 171% | +6% |
Quarter-by-quarter classification · a retrospective read by the current logic · not a price forecast
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice. The method did not see these quarters in real time; this is the current logic applied to past reports.
The market prices in earnings growth; analyst sentiment is weakening; has mostly beaten consensus.
Price against next year's expected earnings. The forward P/E already carries analyst optimism — read it alongside the “Versus consensus” line.
A forward P/E below the current one means the market expects earnings to grow; above it, to fall. The historical growth is realized figures from SEC filings, not a forecast.
The three-month change in the share of positive analyst ratings. This is sentiment, not an earnings-estimate revision, and not a call to act.
When Accenture reports on September 24, 2026, track EPS growth year over year — currently 80% below the sector median at 31.1% — and operating margin, which sits 50% below the median at 29.2%. A narrowing gap on either figure would be a meaningful shift in the mixed F-Score picture.
Pull Accenture's latest 10-K on SEC EDGAR and focus on management's discussion of margin pressure and efficiency. The F-Score efficiency sub-score of 0/2 flags deteriorating asset turnover and gross margin — check whether management addresses a concrete plan to reverse those trends.
Pick two or three companies from the same-sector table in section 06 and line up one metric — Debt/EBITDA or FCF growth year over year are natural choices given ACN's relative strengths at 0.92× and 28.2% growth. No company in the table is ranked; the exercise is to place ACN's figures in a broader peer context you define.
Steps you can check yourself, based on the figures in this brief.
Piotroski F-Score: nine binary tests of financial strength from the annual report. A ✓ marks a test passed, a dot (·) a test failed.
Over 4 years: +5%+2%-4%+26%
Over 4 years: 0.000.000.010.46
Over 4 years: +22%+4%+1%+7%
The context on the right shows how each figure compares with the sector median. The trend below tracks the change over recent fiscal years.
Beat consensus in 8 of 8 recent quarters — the company clears estimates regularly (consensus is often set conservatively).
Last quarter's EPS against consensus, plus the estimated date of the next report.
| 32% |
| ACN | Accenture plc | 4/9 | 26% | +7% | 15% |
| ADBE | Adobe | 7/9 | 55% | +11% | 37% |
| AMAT | Applied Materials | 6/9 | 36% | +4% | 29% |
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices | 7/9 | 7% | +34% | 11% |
| AVGO | Broadcom | 7/9 | 43% | +24% | 40% |
| CRM | Salesforce | 7/9 | 12% | +10% | 20% |
| CSCO | Cisco | 8/9 | 22% | +5% | 21% |
| IBM | IBM | 6/9 | 35% | +8% | — |
| INTC | Intel | 6/9 | -0% | -0% | -4% |
| INTU | Intuit | 8/9 | 20% | +16% | 26% |
| MSFT | Microsoft | 6/9 | 34% | +18% | 47% |
| NOW | ServiceNow | 4/9 | 15% | +21% | 14% |
| NVDA | NVIDIA | 3/9 | 101% | +65% | 60% |
| ORCL | Oracle | 5/9 | 54% | +17% | 31% |
| TXN | Texas Instruments | 7/9 | 30% | +13% | 34% |
A sample of 16 companies in the sector including the target, alphabetical, unranked. Data from the latest SEC annual reports.
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice.
A simplified retrospective read: no analyst forecast (not available historically); the source is the annual report as of the date, so neighbouring quarters can rest on the same data. Quarters with the same classification in a row are merged into one row — each row is one change in the read, not a separate quarter. One ticker is an illustration of the classification logic, not statistics. How we calculate →
The last few quarters are recent context, not a fixed rate. Consensus for near quarters is set low, so companies clear it routinely; over long horizons the forecasts run the other way, too high.
A description of what the market and analysts expect. Not a price forecast and not investment advice. Analyst forecasts run systematically optimistic over long horizons — read them with that discount.