Looking up the ticker with the regulator···
0s · usually 20–30 seconds for a cold read
Looking up the ticker with the regulator···
0s · usually 20–30 seconds for a cold read
Intuit Inc.
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice.
Signals align: quality at a discount to the sector
Get notified when we ship meaningful updates. No spam, no daily noise.
4 of 5 met · composite in line with peers
Business quality, valuation against the sector, and position in the 52-week range — whether they line up or not.
Strong fundamentals
1 signal unavailable
Profitability
4/4
Debt & liquidity
3/3
Efficiency
1/2
Priced at a P/E of 21.8× — -48% below the sector median of 42.0× — Intuit Inc. sits in the top quartile of its sector on valuation, yet the underlying business is growing faster than most peers: revenue grew 15.6% year over year against a sector median of 11.8%. FCF yield of 7.8% runs +317% above the sector median, and the F-Score of 8/9 reflects a clean balance sheet with no new share issuance and stable leverage. ROE of 20.3% trails the sector median of 32.1% by -37%, and ROIC of 17.3% similarly lags — so capital returns are the softer side of the picture. On the forward axis, the realized three-year EPS CAGR per SEC filings is strong, and consensus here leans cautious rather than optimistic; the beat rate over eight quarters is mixed, but the forward PEG reads as reasonable.
| Ticker | Name | F-Score | ROE | Revenue YoY | Op. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | Apple | 8/9 | 171% | +6% |
Quarter-by-quarter classification · a retrospective read by the current logic · not a price forecast
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice. The method did not see these quarters in real time; this is the current logic applied to past reports.
The market prices in earnings growth; analyst sentiment is weakening; has mostly beaten consensus.
Price against next year's expected earnings. The forward P/E already carries analyst optimism — read it alongside the “Versus consensus” line.
A forward P/E below the current one means the market expects earnings to grow; above it, to fall. The historical growth is realized figures from SEC filings, not a forecast.
The three-month change in the share of positive analyst ratings. This is sentiment, not an earnings-estimate revision, and not a call to act.
When Intuit reports on 2026-11-18, track revenue growth year over year alongside free cash flow — the current FCF yield of 1.87% sits 4.2× above the sector median, so any compression there warrants attention. Also check whether ROIC, now 13% below the sector median at 19.8%, shows a narrowing trend.
Pull Intuit's latest annual report on SEC EDGAR and focus on management's discussion of operating leverage and capital allocation. With ROE at 32.1% — 37% below the sector median — the MD&A should explain whether that gap reflects deliberate reinvestment or structural margin pressure.
Pick two or three companies from the alphabetical same-sector table in section 06 and line up a single metric — P/E or P/B works well given Intuit's readings of 42.0× and 9.93×, both well below the sector median. No company in that table is ranked; the exercise is to place Intuit's valuation in context, not to identify a winner.
Steps you can check yourself, based on the figures in this brief.
Piotroski F-Score: nine binary tests of financial strength from the annual report. A ✓ marks a test passed, a dot (·) a test failed.
Over 4 years: +17%+30%-3%+30%
Over 4 years: 2.331.851.461.17
Over 4 years: +32%+13%+13%+16%
The context on the right shows how each figure compares with the sector median. The trend below tracks the change over recent fiscal years.
Beat consensus in 7 of 7 recent quarters — the company clears estimates regularly (consensus is often set conservatively).
Last quarter's EPS against consensus, plus the estimated date of the next report.
| 32% |
| ACN | Accenture | 4/9 | 26% | +7% | 15% |
| ADBE | Adobe | 7/9 | 55% | +11% | 37% |
| AMAT | Applied Materials | 6/9 | 36% | +4% | 29% |
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices | 7/9 | 7% | +34% | 11% |
| AVGO | Broadcom | 7/9 | 43% | +24% | 40% |
| CRM | Salesforce | 7/9 | 12% | +10% | 20% |
| CSCO | Cisco | 8/9 | 22% | +5% | 21% |
| IBM | IBM | 6/9 | 35% | +8% | — |
| INTC | Intel | 6/9 | -0% | -0% | -4% |
| INTU | Intuit Inc. | 8/9 | 20% | +16% | 26% |
| MSFT | Microsoft | 6/9 | 34% | +18% | 47% |
| NOW | ServiceNow | 4/9 | 15% | +21% | 14% |
| NVDA | NVIDIA | 3/9 | 101% | +65% | 60% |
| ORCL | Oracle | 5/9 | 54% | +17% | 31% |
| TXN | Texas Instruments | 7/9 | 30% | +13% | 34% |
A sample of 16 companies in the sector including the target, alphabetical, unranked. Data from the latest SEC annual reports.
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice.
A simplified retrospective read: no analyst forecast (not available historically); the source is the annual report as of the date, so neighbouring quarters can rest on the same data. Quarters with the same classification in a row are merged into one row — each row is one change in the read, not a separate quarter. One ticker is an illustration of the classification logic, not statistics. How we calculate →
The last few quarters are recent context, not a fixed rate. Consensus for near quarters is set low, so companies clear it routinely; over long horizons the forecasts run the other way, too high.
A description of what the market and analysts expect. Not a price forecast and not investment advice. Analyst forecasts run systematically optimistic over long horizons — read them with that discount.