Looking up the ticker with the regulator···
0s · usually 20–30 seconds for a cold read
Looking up the ticker with the regulator···
0s · usually 20–30 seconds for a cold read
Omnicom Group Inc.
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice.
Weak signals across every dimension
Get notified when we ship meaningful updates. No spam, no daily noise.
1 of 5 met · composite in line with peers
Business quality, valuation against the sector, and position in the 52-week range — whether they line up or not.
Weak fundamentals
Profitability
2/4
Debt & liquidity
1/3
Efficiency
0/2
Revenue grew 10.1% year over year — +70% above the sector median — and FCF expanded 87.7%, yet the underlying quality picture tells a different story. The F-Score of 3/9 flags deterioration across profitability, leverage, and efficiency, and EPS growth of -103.6% runs well below the sector median of 0.6%, so the top-line momentum has not translated into earnings. At a P/E of 431.4×, the stock sits +1,413% above the sector median of 28.5×, which is a demanding price for a business with weak fundamentals; Debt/EBITDA of 12.9× exceeds the sector median of 2.5× by +407%, adding balance-sheet pressure. Consensus models a recovery, though the beat rate over the last eight quarters has been weak, and the forward composite of 70/100 rests more on analyst optimism than on a demonstrated earnings track record.
| Ticker | Name | F-Score | ROE | Revenue YoY | Op. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHTR | Charter Communications | 5/9 | 32% |
Quarter-by-quarter classification · a retrospective read by the current logic · not a price forecast
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice. The method did not see these quarters in real time; this is the current logic applied to past reports.
The market prices in earnings growth; analyst sentiment is steady; has mostly beaten consensus.
Price against next year's expected earnings. The forward P/E already carries analyst optimism — read it alongside the “Versus consensus” line.
A forward P/E below the current one means the market expects earnings to grow; above it, to fall. The historical growth is realized figures from SEC filings, not a forecast.
The three-month change in the share of positive analyst ratings. This is sentiment, not an earnings-estimate revision, and not a call to act.
When Omnicom reports on 2026-10-19, track revenue growth year over year against the current 5.94% pace and check whether EPS growth recovers from its deeply negative YoY reading of 0.62%. The F-Score profitability sub-score of 2/4 means any deterioration in return on assets or operating cash flow would be a concrete warning sign.
The leverage and liquidity sub-score of 1/3 flags potential strain — open the most recent 10-K and go straight to the Liquidity and Capital Resources section in Management's Discussion. Cross-check the long-term debt figures against the FCF yield of 3.02% to judge how comfortably free cash flow covers debt-service obligations.
Pick two or three companies from the alphabetical same-sector table in section 06 and line up one metric — P/E, FCF yield, or revenue growth — across your chosen names. Omnicom's P/E of 28.5× and FCF yield of 3.02% give you concrete reference points; the table carries no ranking, so the comparison is yours to draw.
Steps you can check yourself, based on the figures in this brief.
Piotroski F-Score: nine binary tests of financial strength from the annual report. A ✓ marks a test passed, a dot (·) a test failed.
Over 4 years: -34%+58%+19%+75%
Over 4 years: 2.442.452.4112.85
Over 4 years: -0%+3%+7%+10%
The context on the right shows how each figure compares with the sector median. The trend below tracks the change over recent fiscal years.
Beat consensus in 6 of 8 recent quarters — the company clears estimates regularly (consensus is often set conservatively).
Last quarter's EPS against consensus, plus the estimated date of the next report.
| -1% |
| 24% |
| CMCSA | Comcast | 6/9 | 22% | -0% | 17% |
| DIS | Disney | 7/9 | 12% | +3% | 19% |
| EA | Electronic Arts | 6/9 | 13% | +1% | 15% |
| FOXA | Fox Corporation | 5/9 | 15% | +5% | — |
| GOOGL | Alphabet | 5/9 | 36% | +15% | 32% |
| META | Meta Platforms | 4/9 | 30% | +22% | 41% |
| NFLX | Netflix | 6/9 | 43% | +16% | 29% |
| NWSA | News Corporation | 4/9 | 7% | +7% | — |
| OMC | Omnicom Group Inc. | 3/9 | -1% | +10% | 3% |
| T | AT&T | 6/9 | 18% | +3% | 19% |
| TMUS | T-Mobile | 6/9 | 18% | +8% | 21% |
| TTWO | Take-Two Interactive | 7/9 | -11% | +18% | -2% |
| VZ | Verizon | 5/9 | 17% | +3% | 21% |
A sample of 14 companies in the sector including the target, alphabetical, unranked. Data from the latest SEC annual reports.
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice.
A simplified retrospective read: no analyst forecast (not available historically); the source is the annual report as of the date, so neighbouring quarters can rest on the same data. Quarters with the same classification in a row are merged into one row — each row is one change in the read, not a separate quarter. One ticker is an illustration of the classification logic, not statistics. How we calculate →
The last few quarters are recent context, not a fixed rate. Consensus for near quarters is set low, so companies clear it routinely; over long horizons the forecasts run the other way, too high.
A description of what the market and analysts expect. Not a price forecast and not investment advice. Analyst forecasts run systematically optimistic over long horizons — read them with that discount.