Looking up the ticker with the regulator···
0s · usually 20–30 seconds for a cold read
Looking up the ticker with the regulator···
0s · usually 20–30 seconds for a cold read
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Uber operates a platform connecting riders with drivers and customers with food delivery couriers.
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice.
Signals align: quality at a discount to the sector
Get notified when we ship meaningful updates. No spam, no daily noise.
4 of 5 met · composite in line with peers
Business quality, valuation against the sector, and position in the 52-week range — whether they line up or not.
Mixed signals
1 signal unavailable
Profitability
3/4
Debt & liquidity
2/3
Efficiency
0/2
Revenue grew 18.3% year over year — +326% above the sector median of 4.3% — yet the P/E sits at 15.7×, which is -54% below the sector median of 34.0×, an unusual pairing for a business expanding at that pace. FCF yield runs at 6.9%, well above the sector median of 3.1%, so the growth is producing real cash rather than paper gains alone. The F-Score of 5/9 reflects a mixed picture: profitability signals are mostly intact, but the efficiency sub-score reads zero, meaning asset turnover and margin trends have not improved in the latest period. EV/EBITDA at 25.1× runs +25% above the sector median of 20.1×, a tension worth holding alongside the P/E discount. Consensus models continued earnings expansion, though the beat rate over recent quarters has been uneven — the forward composite of 52/100 sits below the trailing composite of 64/100, suggesting the market's optimism carries more uncertainty than the headline growth rate implies.
| Ticker | Name | F-Score | ROE | Revenue YoY | Op. margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BA | Boeing | 6/9 | 289% | +34% |
The market prices in an earnings decline; analyst sentiment is steady; has not always beaten consensus.
Price against next year's expected earnings. The forward P/E already carries analyst optimism — read it alongside the “Versus consensus” line.
A forward P/E below the current one means the market expects earnings to grow; above it, to fall. The historical growth is realized figures from SEC filings, not a forecast.
The three-month change in the share of positive analyst ratings. This is sentiment, not an earnings-estimate revision, and not a call to act.
When Uber reports on November 2, check whether revenue growth year over year holds near its current 4.3× sector-median pace. Also track whether FCF yield stays above 3%, and whether the efficiency signals — both scoring zero on the F-Score — show any improvement in asset turnover or operating leverage.
Pull Uber's most recent 10-K on SEC EDGAR and focus on the segment-level disclosures behind that EV/EBITDA of 20.1×, which sits 25% above the sector median. Management's discussion should clarify what is compressing EBITDA margins relative to the free cash flow the business is generating.
From the same-sector table in section 06, pick two or three companies and line up one metric — EV/EBITDA or FCF yield works well here. The table is alphabetical with no ranking, so the comparison is yours to construct; no single entry should be read as a reference point for the others.
Steps you can check yourself, based on the figures in this brief.
Piotroski F-Score: nine binary tests of financial strength from the annual report. A ✓ marks a test passed, a dot (·) a test failed.
Over 4 years: +152%+762%+105%+42%
Over 4 years: —4.892.381.67
Over 4 years: +83%+17%+18%+18%
The context on the right shows how each figure compares with the sector median. The trend below tracks the change over recent fiscal years.
Beat consensus in 5 of 8 recent quarters — a mixed record.
Last quarter's EPS against consensus, plus the estimated date of the next report.
| 5% |
| CAT | Caterpillar | 6/9 | 44% | +4% | 16% |
| CSX | CSX | 4/9 | 23% | -3% | 32% |
| DE | Deere | 5/9 | 21% | -12% | — |
| EMR | Emerson Electric | 7/9 | 11% | +3% | — |
| ETN | Eaton | 6/9 | 22% | +10% | — |
| GD | General Dynamics | 8/9 | 18% | +10% | 10% |
| GE | GE Aerospace | 5/9 | 46% | +18% | — |
| HON | Honeywell | 6/9 | 29% | +8% | 22% |
| ITW | Illinois Tool Works | 6/9 | 94% | +1% | 26% |
| LMT | Lockheed Martin | 6/9 | 77% | +6% | 10% |
| MMM | 3M | 5/9 | 76% | +2% | 19% |
| RTX | RTX | 7/9 | 11% | +10% | 10% |
| UBER | Uber Technologies, Inc. | 5/9 | 41% | +18% | 11% |
| UNP | Union Pacific | 7/9 | 40% | +1% | 40% |
| UPS | UPS | 4/9 | 34% | -3% | 9% |
A sample of 16 companies in the sector including the target, alphabetical, unranked. Data from the latest SEC annual reports.
Rule-based classification of fundamentals against the sector. Not a price forecast and not investment advice.
The last few quarters are recent context, not a fixed rate. Consensus for near quarters is set low, so companies clear it routinely; over long horizons the forecasts run the other way, too high.
A description of what the market and analysts expect. Not a price forecast and not investment advice. Analyst forecasts run systematically optimistic over long horizons — read them with that discount.